Papers must be original, unpublished, written in USA English, and must be at least 8 (eight) pages but not exceeding 12 (twelve) pages, including abstract, figures, tables, and references. The submission should correspond to the Conference Topics. All papers must comply with the Springer guidelines (paper template). Papers not satisfying these criteria will be excluded from the review.
The number of co-authors is restricted to five. One person can submit two papers at the most, but only one paper as the first author. Plagiarism is strictly followed and will be checked by StrikePlagiarism. Any paper having more than 10% plagiarism will not be accepted for review.
The title, abstract, authors, and affiliations, as well as the order of authors in the EasyChair system, should be the same as in your paper. It is preferable to use ORCID for all co-authors (please visit https://orcid.org for registration).
Use Title Case for the paper title, i.e. capitalizing all main words. No academic titles or descriptions of academic positions should be included in the paper. Leave only one email address (corresponding author) in the paper. All communication will be carried out with the corresponding author only. The corresponding author should provide their corporate e-mail only. Please note that as per Springer guidelines, the private email address of the author will not be displayed.
The abstract should summarize the content (goal, scientific novelty, practical value, main results, etc.) of the paper in short terms, i.e. 150-250 words. Keywords cannot duplicate the words and(or) phrases from the title of the paper. Use high-quality figures in your paper (at least 300 dpi).
The paper should be prepared using the following structure (1 Introduction, 2 Research Methodology, 3 Results and Discussion, 4 Conclusion, 5 Acknowledgment):
- The Introduction section serves as a crucial entry point for readers, providing them with an understanding of the context and importance of the study. It should offer an overview of the research field, pinpoint gaps or controversies within the existing literature, and explicitly outline the study’s objectives and significance. A meticulous review of the current state of the research field is imperative, with careful consideration given to citing key publications. Controversial and divergent hypotheses should be highlighted to underscore the complexity of the subject matter. In adhering to the Editorial Board’s guidance, recent literature indexed by esteemed databases such as Scopus and Web of Science Core Collection is preferred, with a focus on peer-reviewed journals falling within Q1/Q2 quartiles. Each reference should be critically examined separately, avoiding non-English references and grouping citations. Furthermore, a concise summary of the primary conclusions drawn from the review should be provided.
- In the Research Methodology section, it is imperative to provide comprehensive descriptions of methods to enable others to replicate and advance published findings. For novel methods and protocols, elaborate detail is necessary, whereas well-established methods can be succinctly outlined with appropriate citations. Specify the name and version of any software utilized, and indicate whether the computer code is accessible.
- The Results and Discussion section presents a succinct and accurate account of the experimental findings, their analysis, and the resulting conclusions. Authors should delve into the implications of the results and their interpretation in light of prior research and theoretical frameworks. It is essential to contextualize the findings within a broader scope and acknowledge any limitations encountered during the study. Additionally, authors may propose future avenues of research for further exploration.
- The Conclusion section encapsulates the significant findings derived from both qualitative and quantitative data analysis. Additionally, it may incorporate future research directions or plans for further investigation.
- In the Acknowledgment (if necessary) section, express gratitude for the support and assistance that contributed to the attainment of our research outcomes. This includes acknowledging any funding or additional support received.
The Editorial Board highly encourages you to cite up-to-date literature (2019-2024 preferable), which is indexed by databases Scopus and Web of Science (peer-reviewed journals with high impact factors are preferable). The recommended length of the List of References is 15-30 sources. Please avoid non-English references. Self-citation is allowed but no more than 15% of the reference list. This issue will be strictly monitored. References should follow the MathPhys style format, as shown in the ‘Key Style Points: References’ document.